One of the biggest problems with measuring AI progress is the ambiguity of measuring intelligence itself.

AGI is treated as a milestone we have yet to cross, but there is no central definition of AGI.

Depending on who you ask, AGI is achieved when a system:

• can fool humans into thinking it is one of them, in other words, pass a Turing Test
• demonstrates creativity (Springer)
• can develop new skills (DeepMind)
• solves unfamiliar tasks (DeepMind)
• is generally capable across domains (IBM)
• is superior to humans in intelligence (Scientific American)
• outperforms humans economically (OpenAI Charter)
• can independently solve complex problems without human oversight (DeepMind)

Even with the lack of consensus, I can confidently say we have AGI, because the criteria above has been met.